A Sermon Idea for Easter?
So yesterday I was reading for my class on the gospels and I came across an interesting take on the gospel according to Mark. Assuming that the John Mark of the New Testament books of Acts, 1 Peter 5:13
, Colossians 4:10, 2
Timothy 4:11
and Philemon 1:24
is the author of the gospel writing. And also assuming that Mark wrote from Rome to the church in Rome. And also assuming that Mark wrote around 63 AD - 68 AD. Mark we see was writing his story of Jesus to a persecuted, or about-to-be-persecuted, church under Nero. Mark was very acquainted with the apostles Paul and Peter (as referenced above) and thus probably shared in their theology. It is very likely that Mark was building upon Paul’s theological foundation in that he most likely had access to Romans, and a good possibility that he had much of the Pauline corpus. Mark would have been heavily influenced by Paul.
With that said, I want to look at the rending of the temple-curtain found in Mark 15:37-38
where Mark records for us, “But Jesus cried out with a loud voice and breathed his last. And the temple curtain was torn in two, from top to bottom” (NET). Jesus died and then the curtain was rent in two. Traditionally, and correctly I think, this has been taken to mean that the veil that represented our separation from God and only a priest could approach God has been removed. The need for the priests has been fulfilled in Christ as now he is the way to God, being God incarnate or Immanuel. This is very true. Hebrews 4:16
says in light of Jesus being our great high priest, Let us then with confidence draw near to the throne of grace, that we may receive mercy and find grace to help in time of need.” Ephesians 2:18
says that because of Christ, “we both have access in one Spirit to the Father.” We can come before God because of the work of Christ on the cross and resurrection. This is symbolized in the rending of the veil.
But I came across another interpretation that in someways pushes this traditional understanding further and it is pushed, and in other ways is quite different. Building upon the Pauline understanding of Christ, namely Christ crucified (1 Corinthians 2:2
), Mark devotes most of the Passion narrative to the arrest, trials and crucifixion of Jesus. Only Mark 16:1-8
(and I am leaning to the persuasion that Mark 16:9-20
was a scribal addition not original to Mark) speaks of the resurrection and Mark only gives a single verb to assert that Christ rose from the grave in Mark 16:6
, hgerthh. He emphasizes the cross, like Paul does, in his Christology. Now look at Romans 3:25
(my own translation), “whom God put forward as the place of propitiation through faith in his blood, demonstrating his righteousness because of he passed over previously committed sin.” The term I translated “as the place of propitiation” is the Greek term that is translated as “mercy seat” in the LXX. The mercy seat is where God’s glory dwelt in the tabernacle and Temple in OT Israel/NT Judea. By rending the veil, God symbolized that the mercy seat found in the Temple is no longer the place where God’s glory resides. Rather he has moved it and placed his glory in Christ crucified. He resides in Christ and we meet God for forgiveness and the atonement of sin at the cross, not in the Temple and the Ark of the Covenant.
When I heard this, my favorite passage of 2 Corinthians 4:4-6
really came alive again. Paul writes, “In their case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God…For God, who said, ‘Let light shine out of darkness,’ has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.” When Paul speaks of the gospel as the glory of Christ–the image of God, he is not divorcing it from 1 Corinthians 15:3-4
but is rather defining those events as Christ being glorified (cf. John 12:23
). Satan does not want us to see the glory of Christ in the gospel events. But God shines forth the knowledge of his glory in Christ into our hearts and thereby overcomes Satan’s work at the Fall that blinded us. God no longer reveals his glory in the Temple and the Yahweh cult, but rather in Christ is his glory made known to us and when God makes us see his glory in Christ on the cross, we come to him as God in all of his splendor is irresistible to us. He is of infinite delight (Psalm 16:11
) and to see and tasting that delight (Psalm 34:8
) we will not say no.
I might have to store this up for an Easter sermon. But I was totally blown away by this idea. Not only do we have full access to God in Christ crucified because God now resides in Christ on the cross, but the very glory that we are so desperate to see and to fellowship with and savor is in Christ, not some piece of furniture in a building. It is in the person and work of Christ. If you had not heard of this way of understanding the tearing of the veil, I hope it has blessed you as well as it did me. If you have, I hope that you are blessed again by hearing it. I close with Romans 16:25-27
,
25 Now to him who is able to strengthen you according to my gospel and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery that was kept secret for long ages 26 but has now been disclosed and through the prophetic writings has been made known to all nations, according to the command of the eternal God, to bring about the obedience of faith— 27 to the only wise God be glory forevermore through Jesus Christ! Amen.
Related posts:
4 Comments so far
Leave a reply
[...] I blogged over at Think Wink about the symbolism in Mark’s imagery of the torn veil in Mark 15:37-38
. I pray you are as blessed by this new (or for some of you of you not so new) approach to understanding this imagery. You can read it here, A Sermon Idea for Easter? [...]
That’s an interesting angle. You could, perhaps, expand it to include John’s picture of the Word tabernacling (a la Jn. 1:14
) among us. I’ve preached on the torn-veil passage with a different focus, picturing the Father tearing His clothes — the veil of the temple being the closest thing He had — to express His grief.
Regarding Mark 16:9-20
, you may want to visit my multi-part presentation at http://www.curtisvillechristian.org/MarkOne.html for evidence that these 12 verses were in the Gospel of Mark when it was first disseminated for church-use.
“He emphasizes the cross, like Paul does, in his Christology.”
I refer you to 1 Corinthians 15.13-17
. Paul’s “word of the cross” necessarily includes the resurrection. I suggest that the tearing of the temple veil marked the end of the Levitical priesthood.
John,
The idea of Pater tearing the veil like someone tearing his garments in his grief is very interesting. I wouldn’t try to incorporate ho logos tabernacling because that wasn’t in Mark’s mind. That is part of John’s theology, not Mark’s (though I’m not saying that Mark disagreed with that Christology).
Peter,
I definitely agree that Paul did not distinguish the death and resurrection in his gospel presentation. But in his writings, the death of Christ takes center stage, especially in the epistle to the Romans which Mark had direct access to. I would agree that the rending of the veil did put an end to the Levitical priesthood in some sense, though I believe the AD 70 destruction of Jerusalem stated this in its fullest extent.