<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Objections to Calvinism Part 1 of 5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hank.masstheology.com/archives/objections-to-calvinsim-part-1-of-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hank.masstheology.com/archives/objections-to-calvinsim-part-1-of-5/</link>
	<description>1 Chronicles 16:27</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:57:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hank</title>
		<link>http://www.hank.masstheology.com/archives/objections-to-calvinsim-part-1-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-101193</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hank.masstheology.com/archives/objections-to-calvinsim-part-1-of-5/#comment-101193</guid>
		<description>@timothy,

Is there a reason for why you believe that? It isn&#039;t helpful to just label a theology that has been very helpful for centuries (millennia if one goes to Augustine). It makes your statement rather useless to a reader because there is nothing there to read but an assertion that is there for...? I&#039;d like to hear why you feel this way, in all seriousness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@timothy,</p>
<p>Is there a reason for why you believe that? It isn&#8217;t helpful to just label a theology that has been very helpful for centuries (millennia if one goes to Augustine). It makes your statement rather useless to a reader because there is nothing there to read but an assertion that is there for&#8230;? I&#8217;d like to hear why you feel this way, in all seriousness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.hank.masstheology.com/archives/objections-to-calvinsim-part-1-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-101190</link>
		<dc:creator>timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 20:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hank.masstheology.com/archives/objections-to-calvinsim-part-1-of-5/#comment-101190</guid>
		<description>calvinism is a useless theology</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>calvinism is a useless theology</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Objections to Calvinism Part 4 of 5 : Theology for the Masses</title>
		<link>http://www.hank.masstheology.com/archives/objections-to-calvinsim-part-1-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-2524</link>
		<dc:creator>Objections to Calvinism Part 4 of 5 : Theology for the Masses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 21:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hank.masstheology.com/archives/objections-to-calvinsim-part-1-of-5/#comment-2524</guid>
		<description>[...] the next objection on my list, Election and Evangelism. Let me review the series so far. In the first post, I tried to distinguish historic, five-point Calvinism from hyper-Calvinism. In the second post, I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the next objection on my list, Election and Evangelism. Let me review the series so far. In the first post, I tried to distinguish historic, five-point Calvinism from hyper-Calvinism. In the second post, I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Think Wink. &#187; Objections to Calvinism 4 of 5</title>
		<link>http://www.hank.masstheology.com/archives/objections-to-calvinsim-part-1-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-2523</link>
		<dc:creator>Think Wink. &#187; Objections to Calvinism 4 of 5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 21:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hank.masstheology.com/archives/objections-to-calvinsim-part-1-of-5/#comment-2523</guid>
		<description>[...] the next objection on my list, Election and Evangelism. Let me review the series so far. In the first post, I tried to distinguish historic, five-point Calvinism from hyper-Calvinism. In the second post, I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the next objection on my list, Election and Evangelism. Let me review the series so far. In the first post, I tried to distinguish historic, five-point Calvinism from hyper-Calvinism. In the second post, I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Worlds Apart Objections to Calvinism &#171;</title>
		<link>http://www.hank.masstheology.com/archives/objections-to-calvinsim-part-1-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-2339</link>
		<dc:creator>Worlds Apart Objections to Calvinism &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hank.masstheology.com/archives/objections-to-calvinsim-part-1-of-5/#comment-2339</guid>
		<description>[...] Objections to&#160;Calvinism July 12th, 2007 &#8212; Jeff de Ruyter   Think Wink is starting a series looking at the objections to Calvinism. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Objections to&nbsp;Calvinism July 12th, 2007 &#8212; Jeff de Ruyter   Think Wink is starting a series looking at the objections to Calvinism. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Objections to Calvinsim Part 1 of 5 : Theology for the Masses</title>
		<link>http://www.hank.masstheology.com/archives/objections-to-calvinsim-part-1-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-2326</link>
		<dc:creator>Objections to Calvinsim Part 1 of 5 : Theology for the Masses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hank.masstheology.com/archives/objections-to-calvinsim-part-1-of-5/#comment-2326</guid>
		<description>[...] Cross Posted at Think Wink. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cross Posted at Think Wink. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.278 seconds -->
